Donald Trump has spoken out against the South African government’s new land reform policies, accusing the country of embarking on “land grabs” against “certain classes of people”.
South Africa-born Elon Musk, the US president’s close ally, has also attacked the policy, referring to “openly racist ownership laws”.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended South Africa’s Expropriation Act, introduced in January, saying that it will “balance the need for public usage of land and the protection of the rights of property owners”. Ramaphosa vehemently denied that the policy targets white landowners, as Trump had insinuated.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The US president threatened to cut off funding to South Africa until a “full investigation” is completed. The US committed “$440 million in assistance” in 2023, of which “$315 million was for HIV/AIDS”, said Reuters.
What are Trump and Musk claiming?
Trump’s claims “re-energise a far-right cause celebre” that the white minority in South Africa are being “marginalised” and “subjected to ‘genocide'”, said Sky News. Musk has previously accused left-wing party leaders of “openly pushing for genocide of white people”.
While Trump’s social media posts did not explicitly name the Expropriation Act or the “certain classes” being targeted, he suggested in conversation with reporters that the South African government was “confiscating land”. He added: “And actually they’re doing things that are perhaps far worse than that,” said the BBC.
Trump’s accusations come shortly after the “majority white-led civil rights organisation AfriForum said they would lobby for international support”, claiming the new law does not “guarantee the protection of property rights”, said The Africa Report.
What has the South African government said?
The South African government has vehemently denied it is making discriminatory land grabs. Ramaphosa said in a statement on X that the new law was not a “confiscation instrument” but a “constitutionally mandated legal process” that other countries, including the US, also use to ensure there is “access to land in an equitable and just manner”.
Pretoria subsequently said it was “keen to engage diplomatically with the US” over “land reform policy” and that South Africa is “committed to its constitutional democracy”, said Al Jazeera.
In contrast to Ramaphosa’s “measured approach”, Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe directly indicated that South Africa would “consider withholding its mineral exports to the US” if Trump withholds funding.
Does the policy target white South Africans?
The Expropriation Act makes no mention of race and there is no evidence that it is being used specifically to target white landowners. But the most recent census suggests that South Africa’s 7% white population owns 70% of all “privately owned farmland in the country”, said Al Jazeera. These “ongoing disparities in land ownership” are why the government has sought to find ways to create a “more equitable distribution of land”, and why right-wing commentators claim the policy is racially targeted.
South African lawyer and land expert Tembeka Ngcukaitobi told Al Jazeera that claims the government wanted “Zimbabwe-style land grabs” were “plainly not the case”, and that the “hysteria” and “misrepresentation” of the Expropriation Act were “mischievous”.
Previous policies aimed at reducing the disparity of land ownership have “not been used effectively”, said law professor Zsa-Zsa Temmers Boggenpoel on The Conversation. It remains to be seen whether the Expropriation Act is a “silver bullet to effect large-scale land reform”.
Leave a Reply