Rachel Reeves is eyeing cuts to Britain’s £20bn mini-nuclear reactor programme amid a scramble to slash government expenditure, insiders fear.
Sources believe the Chancellor is considering approving a smaller number of reactors than previously expected in an attempt to reduce the costs of the programme, which is part of wider efforts to transform Britain’s power grid.
The competition to design and build the first small modular reactors (SMRs) entered its last phase on Friday, with four finalists – Rolls-Royce, GE-Hitachi, Westinghouse and Holtec – told to submit final bids by mid-April.
It was previously suggested that up to three winners would be chosen by Great British Nuclear (GBN), the quango in charge of running the contest.
But sources said there was concern this has quietly been scaled back to a “maximum” of two – raising the possibility that only one winner will be chosen. Fewer reactors would be built overall as a result.
GBN previously advertised contracts worth £20bn in total for SMR “technology partners”, a figure that is understood to be based on the assumption two winners would be chosen. Bidders have been told to prepare to build three to four mini reactors.
Going down to only one vendor would potentially halve the cost to £10bn over 15 years, with the biggest annual costs expected in the late 2020s and early 2030s when construction actually starts.
Separate contracts worth around £2bn for construction, project management and engineering audits have also been mooted by GBN, again based on an assumption of two vendors.
Ms Reeves and the Treasury are in negotiations with Whitehall departments over their settlements for the forthcoming spending review, which is expected to be published in June.
The Chancellor is struggling to balance the books as weak economic growth makes it harder to meet her self-imposed “fiscal rules” for borrowing.
‘Everything is on the table’
Industry sources said there had as yet been no suggestion that ministers had decided to scale back the SMR programme.
But the final outcome has been linked to the spending review and there remains uncertainty about how many vendors will be chosen.
One person briefed on the discussions warned: “It all comes down to the spending review. Everything is on the table.”
SMRs are seen as a potential breakthrough in nuclear power because they would be made predominantly in factories and then assembled on site, cutting building times from around a decade to a few years. They would also cost far less than large plants.
However, the nascent technology remains commercially unproven, with a string of European countries and the US all currently pursuing their own individual competitions to fund the first examples of the technology.
Scaling back Britain’s SMR programme would represent a significant retreat for Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, who this month announced plans to speed up the development of the mini reactors and vowed to “build, baby, build”.
Officials at both GBN and the Energy Department, run by Ed Miliband, are understood to be pushing for the Government to stick with the original ambition to pick two SMR developers.
A Whitehall source also pointed to recent remarks about SMRs by Sir Keir and Mr Miliband, adding there was “a clear pro-SMR mood inside government”.
However, there are fears that Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, is under pressure to choose which energy schemes he will prioritise as he scrambles to deliver Labour’s promise of a clean power system by 2030.
Holtec’s designs for a small modular reactor are one of the final four proposals that the Government will assess
Alongside SMRs, there is competition for cash from wind farms, carbon capture projects and various hydrogen schemes, among other things.
Nuclear industry sources warned that relying on one company to develop the first SMRs would reduce “competitive tension” and leave the Government with a weaker hand during cost negotiations.
The competition has suffered repeated delays, with ministers in the previous Conservative government originally suggesting it would be concluded last spring.
This week it emerged there had been yet another delay, with the deadline for final bid submissions moved back from the end of March to mid-April.
Commenting on the latest stage of the competition, Mr Miliband said: “Small modular reactors will support our mission to become a clean energy superpower.
“That’s why we are backing new nuclear technology to help secure our energy independence and grow the economy.”
Simon Bowen, chairman of GBN, said: “This is an exciting moment for Great British Nuclear and the UK as we reach the final stage of the technology selection process for the small modular reactor programme.
“Nuclear energy is vital for economic growth and delivering secure, reliable, home-generated power that is capable of meeting future demand, enabling net zero, and reducing the UK’s dependence on importing fossil fuels.
“Since GBN was launched in 2023, the team has made huge strides in delivering a fair, robust, and transparent process for technology selection.”
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman said: “New nuclear power stations, including small modular reactors, will play an important role in helping the UK achieve energy security and clean power while securing thousands of good, skilled jobs.
“Thanks to decisive action, the four companies shortlisted in Great British Nuclear’s SMR competition have now been invited to submit final bids, with final decisions to be taken in the spring.”
The Treasury was contacted for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
#Rachel #Reeves #eyes #cuts #Britains #20bn #mininuclear #project
Leave a Reply